Category Archives: Spiritual life

Strength to Love

So apparently I was kidding when I said I don’t like to post my sermons online, because I’m posting another one!  In all seriousness, we are very close to having our podcasting up and running, but until that time, I’ve agreed to post my messages when people ask.  Our theme this month at First Parish Church in Taunton is Love, and we talked this past Sunday about the strength it takes to love.

Strength to Love

imagesOur reading this morning was from a book a sermons from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., that he wrote largely in response from his role in the non-violent protests and marches that he lead during the 1960’s in the Southern part of the United States. The title of the book is where the title from this message came from, which is Strength to Love. It is a wonderful book, filled with his sermons and messages on how tempting it is for African Americans in the 1960’s, and indeed for all of us, to move to hate, and about how it takes in fact more strength to love than to hate.

It’s funny, if you think about it, because in our culture, “Hate” is something that is thought of as an emotion of the strong. People who hate are warriors – they kill and they dominate – when you hate, you often have the control in the situation. You are the one who is the angriest, you are the one that can do the most damage. You are the Terminator, you are the lone gunman, you, above all, are the one who is reeking with power. “Love” is something that we think about affiliated with flowers and bunnies, warm chocolate and Valentine’s Day. Random question Valentine’s Day is coming up: are there any of you here today who think of Valentine’s Day as a particularly strength-filled holiday? Not so much, right? Valentine’s Day is all about the flowers and the candy and the soft lighting. It is not a holiday about strength or power. And yet Dr. King argued, with a high degree of success, that love is more powerful than hate, more powerful than injustice, and even more powerful than fear.

Last year, I was at a retreat for ministers, where were supposed to work on facing our emotions. We did some exercises around emotions, and why we felt the way we did about things, and what those emotions meant to us. And then we broke up into small groups and did some rapid-fire questions about emotions – you know, the type that you see on a game show. “What was your happiest day? When was the first time you were afraid?” What makes you angry?” And the point of the exercise was supposed to be to go with you gut, not to say what you thought about or what you think sounds the best, but what is your first instinct. And when the question came to me, the one I was asked in a rapid fire way was “When was a time that you faced a fear?” And what popped out of my mouth was “The day I decided marry my husband.” And the reaction from the group was funny, I have to tell you, because half of them started to laugh, and the other half stared at me, horror-struck, thinking that I was somehow forced into an arranged marriage.

Let me put your minds at rest here. I was not forced into an arranged marriage, and the decision to marry my husband Eric was one that was entirely mine and one that I made with great joy. And it is one that I live with with great joy. But it was not easy. Some of you have heard me mention that when I was younger, getting married was not part of my plan. I had seen some terribly hard things happen in marriages and I was determined that I would not subject myself to the challenges and pain that marriage seemed capable of brining. But when I met my husband, I knew beyond a shadow of a doubt that I wanted to live the rest of my life with him. I knew that, and that knowledge terrified me. Because I also knew that if I accepted that in my life, I was accepting the tremendous risk of pain and fear and loss. It was so hard. I had to look at these two options, squarely in the face, and decide which one would be the best option for me, for my life – would I let this man walk away and I would go forward by myself, as had always been my plan and would keep me safe from potential pain – or would I take his hand and walk with him, knowing that each day as I loved him more, I was accepting a richer life, but on that held much more potential pain. Loving is hard.

I’m glad to say that I took the stronger path. I knew I had to, because of the life I wanted to live, but I will be honest in telling all of you here that it was something that took a lot of strength for me to face my fears and accept that in order to live fully, I could not hide behind the fear of loss or change or difference. Henri Nouwen was a Catholic priest and theologian who lived in the 20th century. He was a prolific writer, and was particularly interested in studying the relationship between human emotions and the purpose of our being here on earth. In one of his articles, he stated that “Every time we make the decision to love someone, we open ourselves to great suffering, because those we most love cause us not only great joy but also great pain. The greatest pain comes from leaving. When the child leaves home, when the husband or wife leaves for a long period of time or for good, when the beloved friend departs to another country or dies … the pain of the leaving can tear us apart. Still, if we want to avoid the suffering of leaving, we will never experience the joy of loving. And love is stronger than fear, life stronger than death, hope stronger than despair. We have to trust that the risk of loving is always worth taking.”

Years ago, I was given an example from a teacher of mine that I’d like to share with you today. He taught me that the proportion that we open ourselves to experiencing pain and fear is directly proportional to the love and joy we can experience. Take a book. Look at the binding, which has a middle and two edges. We can live in the middle, feeling just small pieces of joy, or we can move our lives to the edges, feeling love with passion and vim, and feeling pain in such a way that it can seem overwhelming. What my teacher taught us is that if you want to live with love fully – all the way over to the edge of the binding – you will also open yourself up to pain – living on the other edge of the binding. Many of us, myself included, are tempted to live in the middle. The middle is where it is safe, for us, for our hopes, and for our fears. But what Nouwen is correctly pointing out to us is that if we live in the middle, we are losing the best parts of life. The parts of life that in the last days, we look back on with joy and know that yes, we have lived. We have not let ourselves be ruled by fear and by the ideas of what-if, but we have followed our hearts and our dreams and taken the strength to love.

There are two kinds of love that we are talking about here, and it’s important for us to be clear about both of them and how they are related. There is the personal and there is the societal. Sometimes, we like to think that they are separate, because that way we don’t have to engage beyond ourselves. But the truth of the matter is that the love that Dr. King talked about – the love that the Black community must have for the White community even as they face off on terrible lines of injustice and hate – is the same kind of love that Nouwen is talking about in our own lives, with the people we know, with our children and our spouses and our co-workers and our friends. Hear King’s words again – “Hatred and bitterness can never cure the disease of fear; only love and do that. Hatred paralyzes life; love releases it.”

When I first moved to Boston, I worked at a homeless shelter for men. I worked under a hard-bitten Bostonian, who had been arrested dozens of times for his social justice actions on the behalf of the homeless, and whose brusque ways and sharp tongue frightened my Midwestern, Minnesota-nice sensibilities. The men in our shelter were struggling in one way or another, and there was very little about their lives that was easy. My boss showed me and my co-workers the ropes, in a very brusque way, and then then said as he was finishing up his talk, said “You can think what you want about these guys, and the lives they have lead and where they are now. You don’t have to agree with all of their choices. But if you can’t love them, you can get out now.” A man who was training with me, a young college student, raised his hand and asked our boss, “Is that really true? You think that we need to love them to wash the dishes and set out dinner and make sure the Pats game is on the the TV? I think we need to respect them, but who we love is our own business.” And our boss – the guy who broke up fights and swore constantly, got right up in this kid’s face and said “No, you are wrong. You don’t love them like you love your mother – I get that. But loving these guys means that you know that who they are matters every bit as much as who you are, and that you are willing to be changed by them. And if you can’t do that, you can’t be here. Because none of us are going anywhere if you can’t love.” The kid backed down, and he stayed working at the shelter with me for the whole year. And we talked later about what it meant to love men who were making choices that we didn’t always agree with, and that we wished were different. But at the end of the year, that kid was different. He was changed by the guys we worked with, and in June, he went to our boss and thanked him.

Loving isn’t always about chocolates and roses. It’s not even all about partnership and families. It’s about facing fears and living. It’s about knowing that there is so much that is outside of our control and that our lives will be hard, but that with loving, the joy will matter so much more than the pain. It’s about knowing that we all have the ability to love so far beyond ourselves, and that that ability can change everything. It can change fear and segregation and injustice. It can change the course of your life. It can change the course of the life of the child that you have taken into your heart and loved so much that her world is a more beautiful place because you love her. Loving is about facing the fears and living to the edges of the page.

So this week, I want to ask all of you to take on a new challenge, and it is a challenge I will take on with you for your homework. This week, I want you to find something or someone new to love. Not someone that is already in your life and that is easy – your kids or your best friend or your spouse – but something that you have not tried loving before. Perhaps it will be that person at work who you have not always gotten along with, but that you can open your heart to. Maybe it will be the new organization that is bringing forth hopes and dreams for the city you love. Maybe you will find a way to open your heart to love a person you know is alone, and who needs love. I want to be clear – this is not a call to, as my old boss said, love these people like your mother. But it is a call to be willing to be changed by them, and to open yourself to the joy and the pain of loving. To have the strength to love. May it be so.

What is Unitarian Universalism – in 30 seconds?

When I meet with people who have heard of Norton Unitarian Church and are interested in what we are doing, inevitably the question comes up: “So what is Unitarian Universalism all about?  What is this church about?”

It is a complicated question that, realistically, takes a lifetime to answer.  It’s also one that requires an answer in under thirty seconds.  My answer is not terribly eloquent but it gets the point across.

“Unitarian Universalism is generally left-leaning.  We were the first people to ordain women to the ministry, and we accept all people, regardless of race, class, or sexual orientation.  That’s a core value of our faith.  At Norton Unitarian we believe we need to love all people and to think.  Doing both at the same time can be very difficult, but it is what we believe we are called to do.”

To love all people and to think.  That’s the heart of what has kept me in the UU faith for the last several years, and it is what has sustained my ministry.  It is why I keep coming back to this religion, and why I have faith in what we do – what Norton Unitarian Church is all about.

It’s not an easy thing to do, at least not for me.  One of my favorite articles on this subject was written by UU minister Meg Barnhouse and published not long after the terrible shooting in the Unitarian Universalist Church in Knoxville, Tennessee.  Meg wrote about how she had met the shooter at a Unitarian Universalist summer camp several years before, and how she had struggled with his views at that time.  She wrote:

“We love to think of ourselves as open-minded, but it’s hard for us to be open-minded toward certain people and their views. Maybe it’s just me that has a hard time, but I think I’m not alone in this. I argued with him, too. I do affirm the worth and dignity of every person, but I never promised to affirm the worth and dignity of every idea. Some ideas are oppressive and not well thought out. They lead to violence and injustice and really bad behavior. I try to argue with respect and kindness, but it’s hard when the person you’re talking to acts like a jerk. If I were the Dalai Lama or a UU saint, I would be able to, and I hope that will come in the future, but I am sure not there yet.”

To love all people and to think.  To love the shooters who are terrorizing our churches and schools and grocery store parking lots, while knowing that what they are doing is completely and totally, gut-wrenching wrong.  It’s not easy to do both of these, at least not for me.  Sometimes I would much rather sit in judgement of another person than engage in the struggle of loving and thinking.

To me, a religion needs to be something that we strive to live up to.  It needs to be something that we can’t “complete” or “be without knowing it.”  It has to be something that guides us – something that helps us to live better lives and become the best people we can be.

Anchored in Unitarian Universalism

When I was twenty-two years old, I tried to convert.

I was raised Unitarian Universalist.  Daughter and granddaughter of Unitarian Universalists, child of active church board members and a student at the local Montessori school, I was steeped in UU values and beliefs.  And like many people, I wanted to experiment – I wanted to engage with a different faith than that I’d known my whole life.

I had studied religion in college, and was fascinated by the way that people’s religious beliefs influenced their lives and their decisions.  I wanted to see what else was out there – perhaps a religion that could offer me more guidance, something that could give me the concrete answers on cosmological questions that Unitarian Universalism never had.

So I began to attend other churches, and even a synagogue.  I visited the Episcopalians, the Reform Jews and the UCC’s.  I shared coffee with Baptists and sang with the Methodists.  I was inspired by many of their stories and loved that they said the same thing every week.  As I dabbled, however (and really enjoyed the Baptists, I’ll be honest!), I found I was running into a significant hitch.  I didn’t believe what these churches were saying.

They said they had the answer.  Most of them repeated the Nicaean Creed, and they relied on the Bible and the Torah for guidance.  But when it came right down to it, it didn’t seem to me that they didn’t know any more about the meaning of the cosmos than my Unitarian Universalist communities. They had beliefs and hopes, but they didn’t have the answers in their theology.  Not answers I could believe.

So I came home.  I returned back to the wrestle-with-the-questions community I had been raised in and started to look again for answers.  For guidance on how to make the best decisions I could.  For a community that could sustain me as I faced living in a world that isn’t always pretty, but sometimes more beautiful than I can believe.  And here in this church, I found something that was amazing – I found Unitarian Universalist theology.  And with that, I found an anchor that helped me understand the questions; an anchor that helped – and helps! – me live my life.

The Progress of Women

Sexism looks different than it did 100 years ago.

I know that 100 years ago, sexism was blatant and appalling, and involve the kinds of atrocities that we thankfully rarely see any more….or if we do see them, we have the decency as a society to be horrified by them.  Sexism used to involve sexual harassment and brutality and no representation in Congress.  It used to mean being barred from professions and no right to reproductive choice.

Today, sexism looks different.  It’s less blatent.  It’s often under the carpet.  It’s harder to define and harder to prove.  In my experience of sexism today (which I once naively believed I would never have), it is still prevalent.  It is unquestionably better than is used to be – without a doubt!  We have much to be proud of in society today compared to 100 years ago.

In my life I’m blessed to not often be subject to “old school” sexism.  I still get the average amount of irritating catcalls when I’m walking down the street in the summertime and the kids are home with my husband.  There is one convenience store near our house that I won’t shop at because of the demeaning way they treat me, and apparently all women who enter their shop.  But that’s about it.

What I notice far more prevalently, however, are the comments.  The comments people make to me, and sometimes to my friends.  The comments like “You plan to keep working, even though you have small children?  Who will take care of them?” “You know you can’t expect that kind of pay, why are you asking for so much from them?”  ”I really don’t think you capable of that that”  and (my personal favorite) “Ssshhhh”

We’ve won a place at the table, but the table isn’t a place of equals.  And sometimes, “sssshhhh” can be hard to fight.  Because sometimes they are right and you do need to sshhh.  But then you ask yourself……how much do the men need to ssshhh?  Not so much, it turns out.  And how many men are “capable” of the things women are not “capable” of?  Quite a few, as it turns out.  And let’s not even get started on the pay and who’s taking care of the children…….

When I graduated from college at twenty-two years old, I really did not think I would experience much sexism in my life.  I felt sure that my mother and grandmother’s generations had taken care of that, and it was hard to learn that I was wrong.  However, we have achieved so much in the last 100 years.  Let’s make the next 100 even better!

Happy 100th International Women’s Day!

On the Bus to Heaven

One of my favorite books is C.S. Lewis’ The Great Divorce.  I don’t agree with all of Lewis’ theology, and am certainly not a fan of his distinctly modernist understandings of good and evil.  But I *love* the ideas presented in The Great Divorce, specifically the imagery he puts forth for Heaven and Hell.

The basic premise of the book is fairly simple.  Hell, or Purgatory, is a place that a lot of people live in.  It is a grey, dismal town with no sense of community and a lot of fish and chips shops.  Everyone who wants to is free to board the bus, a vehicle “blazing with golden light” that will take people to Heaven.   Once in Heaven, the newcomers have to face radical adjustments due to the astonishing beauty that is around them.  The newcomers are guided by angels, who both support them and assure them that with time, the beauty and joy of Heaven will become natural to them.  But as the story continues, we watch nearly all of the newcomers re-board the bus and go back to Hell….because they would rather be in a place they know and have some false sense of control, than in a place of beauty where they have to work to accept a new and better life.

Sometimes, we would so much rather live a known Hell than work to be part of a new Heaven.  The pull to live in the known rather than the unknown is astonishingly strong, even when then known is grey, dreary, and stretches on in loneliness forever.  Lewis makes no bare bones in The Great Divorce that becoming acclimated to beauty is painful at first.  He talks about how it is hard for the newcomers to walk on the grass because it is so sharp, and to see all of the beauty because it is so bright.

What I love about this book is not the pictures painted of Heaven and Hell – though I do think there is something fabulous about a grey Hell that smells like old fish – but the fact that through this allegory, Lewis acknowledges how hard change is.  In this story, people are voluntarily LEAVING HEAVEN to go back to Hell….simply because it is a place they know, and one that does not require them to change.

Change is hard.  Seriously, change is hard.  Hard and scary and sometimes feels impossible.  But I love Lewis’ challenge – shall we live in a known Hell or a brave new Heaven?  Can we bear to face the joy that can be ours?  In our lives, in our churches, in our communities and our own souls?

What does your Heaven look like?

So How Do You Re-start a Church?

I get this question a lot.

It would be great if there was a one-sentence answer.

There isn’t.

I’m not sure I know how to re-start a church.  But I do know how to listen.  And that’s been the most important part of what I’ve been doing for the past several months.  I’ve been meeting with enormous numbers of people, and I’ve been listening to what they want and need.  I’ve been listening to why they don’t go to church, in what ways they feel disconnected, and what they are looking for in a spiritual community.   I’ve been meeting people where they are, in their coffee shops and homes and offices.

I’ve also been listening to myself.  At the beginning of this process, I put one bottom line in place, which is written on a post-it note and stuck right next to my computer screen.  It says:

“The purpose of this church is to help people grow spiritually and to make the world a better place.”  This isn’t a congregational mission statement or faith statement or any other kind of institutional reflection.  It’s just my bottom line.  It is why I’m doing this, why I get up every morning and work on building a congregation….to fill a building standing ready, waiting to be filled with mission and vision and purpose.

From listening to people, I’ve found that I’m not the only person who is looking for a church that helps me grow spiritually and makes the world a better place.  There’s a lot of us out there, looking for something deeper to connect to.  We are thinking about death and happiness and forgiveness, and want to participate in the world in a more active way than voting on American Idol.

And as we all come together, something magic is starting to happen. Something that is precious and extraordinary and simple and common.

We are building a church.

What are we looking for?

It is a pretty commonly accepted fact that not a lot of Americans today attend church.  Most data suggests that between 40 percent and 50 percent of people in Generations X and Y did not grow up attending any kind of church at all.

Those who were born after 1970 (X and Y are generally defined as people born between 1965 and 1990) had Baby Boomer parents who lived through the tumult of the 1960s, saw JFK and Martin Luther King, Jr., shot, and were involved in the Vietnam War in one way or another.

Many Boomer parents did not send their kids to church because they themselves were breaking out of the norms of the day.  And how much more “normative” do you get than going to church?  Even those who did send their kids to church or who attended as a family often did so in a very relaxed fashion.  There were the “Christmas and Easter” families, of course, but also the families who went to church only when their kids were little or, in the Catholic faith, until their youngest child “made First Communion.”

As a result of all this, and other factors, many churches today are dying.  People don’t go because they never have.  They may visit a few times, but don’t find it relevant.  They sing songs they don’t know, recite prayers they have never heard and get asked to be on committees.  Sometimes they stay.  More often, they leave.

Yet the fundamental religious need has not changed.  The desire to have a life full of meaning and purpose is alive in all of us.  The questions about faith and God and death go through all of our minds.

So what are we looking for from churches?  My theory is that we are looking for a place to share our experiences and ask questions.  We don’t want a place that tells us what to do, but we do want guidance.  We want to enjoy our time, because life’s too short to do something that is more “work,” and we could always be playing Farmville.  We want to laugh, do something meaningful, and know that we are not alone.

What do you think?

Why Church?

I recently reconnected with someone I used to work with in hospice.  She is a lovely person, and asked me honestly why I had left the field, and moved my professional life from hospice chaplaincy to parish work.

“And why”….she continued  “this church?  A church that’s just beginning?  Why would you do something so unusual?  Don’t you miss hospice?  Isn’t this all planning and program work, and no time really with the people?”

To an extent, she is right.  Parish life, at least restarting a church with the intention of significant growth, is about a lot of planning and development work.  Where I used to spend all my days with people, holding hands and being part of an experience, I am now spending a lot of time writing, talking on the phone, planning and organizing.   I still meet with people, but it is much less frequently, and for very different reasons.

Hospice work is awesome, and I think it’s a program WAY more people should be involved with, both in terms of volunteering and receiving care.  But I have to say, I think the church is awesome too.  The ideas we are working with are just incredibly important.  How do we make a church that is relevant to people’s lives?   Does community really have a purpose, or are we all better off on our own?   What makes church – or any kind of spiritual experience – meaningful?

It matters because none of us can go it alone.